Jul 10 2008

So the Pope is com­ing to Sydney, and the New South Wales Gov­ern­ment is scram­bling to pro­tect him. What bet­ter way to shield an abso­lute mon­arch than with des­potic legislation?

We can bitch and whine about it. We can blatantly flout these laws and hand out free con­doms, as some are plan­ning.

Or we could stop and think about it. If only we could identify the oppor­tun­ity here.

Here’s my sug­ges­tion: make badges/​buttons — lots of them. Print on them, in big bold let­ters, “ANNOYING”. Noth­ing more. The aim isn’t to offend, it’s to pass­ively protest stu­pid laws and cel­eb­rate our freedoms.

Now, get people to sell the badges. Have volun­teers spread all over the city selling them. Also make deals with shops to have them avail­able next to the till.

Recog­nise this idea? It’s no dif­fer­ent from what’s done on Daf­fodil Day or Red Nose Day. Have the pro­ceeds go towards assist­ing AIDS vic­tims. I would sug­gest AIDS orphans. Make sure the group it goes to is cred­ible and sec­u­lar. It’s heart­break­ing how many so-​​called ‘char­it­ies’ are just cyn­ical mis­sion­ary Inquis­i­tions in drag.

I con­sider this to be a win for all. Cit­izens get to peace­fully protest, World Youth Day isn’t dis­rup­ted, and the chil­dren get some help. Would the gov­ern­ment dare to stop this? Would they halt a funds-​​raising oper­a­tion for dis­ad­vant­aged chil­dren? I don’t know, but it’s worth a shot.

I’d actu­ally be sur­prised if this is an ori­ginal idea. I haven’t had time to pay much atten­tion to the mat­ter, so I’d expect that someone is already work­ing on some­thing similar.

(fully expect­ing the oblig­at­ory “why is this on Planet xxx???” whinging from people who don’t under­stand the point of a Planet and who like to oppress those whom they dis­agree with)

LotD:  Happy, Healthy Har­old — Behind The Puppet

12 Responses

  1. Aitor de la Morena Says:

    If it was some other group who organ­ised such a big event, I’m sure you would be happy. But no, it’s the evil Cath­olic Church, whose char­ity organ­iz­a­tions “are just cyn­ical mis­sion­ary Inquis­i­tions in drag”. You are full of pre­ju­dice against a com­munity of people who does much more good than evil. Once I was like you but, hey, I’m a con­vert now. I beg to God that He helps you so you can look bey­ond the money quant­it­ies and lithur­gical vests, and see a large amount of people liv­ing and cel­eb­rat­ing peace, love, justice, and freedom…the true ones, not the one that are sold nowadays.

  2. Chuck Says:

    Inter­est­ing.

    For those who dis­agree with your post­ing to cer­tain planet they are whinging and oppress­ing those they dis­agree with.

    Aren’t they simply express­ing their own opin­ions and you are want­ing to oppress their right to disagree?

  3. Luca Says:

    Sir, you are a ver­it­able genius. We’d need the likes of you here in Italy, where we have to deal with the likes of those who organ­ized the pro­tec­tion meas­ures every day. Without men­tion­ing the con­stant intru­sion of clergy into civil mat­ters … quite as severe as it is in US, sadly.
    To Señor de la Morena: here there is no pre­ju­dice stated, only annoy­ance at the over-​​the-​​top secur­ity meas­ures adop­ted for the event. And sug­ges­tions to protest against those in a civil, but still firm and effect­ive way.

  4. Aitor de la Morena Says:

    Maybe they’re being a bit extreme on secur­ity meas­ures, yes, but I guess that is because they don’t want what happened to John Paul II hap­pen­ing again. Clergy has their right to “intrude” into civil mat­ters, because they are cit­izens too. I agree that there is right to protest, and that Srid­har has sug­ges­ted a civil way, but I had to defend my point of view, because I’m very sens­ible to pre­ju­dices ;) Oh, and you can call me Aitor!

    Peace.

  5. Mackenzie Says:

    @Aitor de la Morena:
    It’s not that the Cath­olic Church is evil per se, but that telling people that con­doms are use­less and won’t pro­tect them from AIDS is a blatant lie, some­thing which last I checked viol­ated the 10 Com­mand­ments, a ten­ant of the Cath­olic Church. The people are fine. The prob­lem is the lead­er­ship. It’s the same as the US. As a people, I think we’re just fine, but our pres­id­ent is an idiot.

  6. Dorian Says:

    Wow. Who pissed in your cer­eal, mate?

    Hon­estly I don’t know where to start to poke holes in your argu­ment. First the Pope is not an abso­lute mon­arch. You don’t have to listen to him, if you don’t want to. Second, as for secur­ity… nobody wants to deal with the fal­lout of a pos­sible assas­sin­a­tion attempt of head of state, and their enough crazy people out there that would try. And last time I checked con­doms were to stop sperm, not vir­uses that are a thou­sandth the size of a human sperm cell. So dear sir, do us the favour and stop spread­ing FUD.

  7. Sridhar Dhanapalan Says:

    Aitor de la Morena,

    When I said “cyn­ical mis­sion­ary Inquis­i­tions in drag”, I never singled out any single religion/​sect. This is a prob­lem across many religions.

  8. Sridhar Dhanapalan Says:

    Dorian,

    Yes, the Pope is an abso­lute mon­arch. I sug­gest that you take a look at the polit­ical sys­tems of the Vat­ican. To quote Wiki­pe­dia:

    The papacy is a non-​​hereditary, elect­ive mon­archy, chosen by the Col­lege of Car­din­als. The Pope is also tech­nic­ally an abso­lute mon­arch, mean­ing he has total legis­lat­ive, exec­ut­ive and judi­cial power over Vat­ican City. He is the only abso­lute mon­arch in Europe. The Pope is elec­ted for a life term in con­clave by car­din­als under the age of 80.”

    Go back and re-​​read, and you should see that my ‘abso­lute mon­arch’ com­ment was much more a jab at the NSW Gov­ern­ment than at the Vatican.

    As for secur­ity, have you actu­ally seen the laws passed here? Speak­ing gen­er­ic­ally about ‘secur­ity’ doesn’t help this dis­cus­sion. Nobody is say­ing that a major world leader doesn’t deserve security.

    And for con­doms… where did I ever defend/​condemn con­doms in the art­icle? I’m not going to debate your point­less argu­ment, as it has noth­ing to do with what I wrote about.

    So please have some clue about what you’re talk­ing about before you scream ‘FUD’.

  9. Sridhar Dhanapalan Says:

    Chuck,

    It depends on how they make their protest. If they can reas­on­ably state why they believe so, I have no prob­lem with that. The last thing I want to hinder is free­dom of speech.

    It’s the people who just yell “why is this on planet xxx???”, and noth­ing more, whom I object to. It’s happened to me, and I’ve seen it in a load of other places too.

  10. eatme Says:

    link­age

    http://​noto​pope​.com/

    http://​sydney​.indy​media​.org​.au/​e​v​e​n​t​/​n​o​t​o​p​o​p​e​-​c​o​a​l​i​t​i​o​n​-​p​r​o​t​e​s​t​s​-​p​o​p​e​-​a​n​d​-​w​o​r​l​d​-​y​o​u​t​h​-​day

  11. Sridhar Dhanapalan Says:

    Luca,

    You’ve hit the nail on the head. That’s exactly what I was try­ing to say :)

  12. Marcin Trybus Says:

    The NSW NoTo­Pope Coali­tion will peace­fully protest on (…) at (…).”

    LMAO. A peace­ful hate protest to defend the con­dom and extramar­ital homo­sexual sex from an abso­lute mon­arch groun­ded on his state­ments from 1990s. :-D

    How more stu­pid left­ists can get? What’s strange nobody ever protests to let Jews eat pork, or to let Muslims drink alco­hol. Maybe it’s because Cath­ol­ics are nowhere as prone to kick back as the other two. If Muslim youth was meet­ing would they give away free vodka, because their unne­ces­sary strict reli­gion for­bids it?

    An oppress­ive govt will always find “legit­im­ate reas­ons” to cut cit­izen rights. No WYD held in Europe required any of these drastic meas­ures. You really should blame your govt. I would.

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

Think different / 'Til All Are One by Sridhar Dhanapalan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike Australia CC BY-SA AU licence.