Feb 28 2007

There appears to be much con­fu­sion amongst the press and the gen­eral popu­lace regard­ing the One Laptop Per Child Pro­ject, which I blogged about earlier. This art­icle in the Mur­doch press, for example, has stim­u­lated some of these mis­con­cep­tions. They stem from the false assump­tion that the OLPC is a com­put­ing pro­ject. “Don’t these kids deserve food, water, cloth­ing and shel­ter first?”, some people ask.

The fact is that the OLPC is far more than a simple com­put­ing pro­ject. It is an edu­ca­tion pro­ject, or more broadly, a devel­op­ment pro­ject. The com­puter is merely the tool to enable edu­ca­tion and cre­ativ­ity. How can one learn when a text­book costs more than an aver­age weekly wage? Ima­gine if you could inter­act with your text­book, in the form of games and exer­cises. Ima­gine if you could learn to write your own soft­ware for this device, and dis­trib­ute it to help oth­ers in your com­munity. You can cre­ate your own art­works, write your own novel or make your own music. Wire­less mesh net­work­ing allows the dis­tri­bu­tion of data between com­puters, and even the shar­ing of one Inter­net con­nec­tion across a vil­liage. For many house­holds, the key­board lights will be the only form of arti­fi­cial light­ing. The pos­sib­il­it­ies are effect­ively limitless.

The point that I am try­ing to make is that it is not the com­puter that is import­ant, it is what you can do with it that truly mat­ters. The com­puter is an ena­bler, a tool that allows people to ulti­mately cre­ate their own live­li­hoods and futures. There’s no point in keep­ing people depend­ent on handouts. Let’s encour­age them to stand on their own feet.

Back in the developed world, I was able to attend a panel dis­cus­sion for NSW ICT for the forth­com­ing state elec­tion. Pia made some good ana­lysis of the event. In sum­mary, the rep­res­ent­at­ive for the Lib­eral Party was com­pletely and utterly use­less when the ques­tion turned to open stand­ards and FLOSS. Moreover, both sides (Labour and Lib­eral) would seem­ingly delib­er­ately con­fuse open stand­ards and open source when ques­tioned about them. The key when ques­tion­ing such people is to not men­tion open stand­ards and open source together. Force them to address the issues sep­ar­ately, or they will con­flate the two. The City of Munich was dis­par­agingly referred to sev­eral times as an extreme case. What dis­turbs me is that there was spe­cific­ally strong emphasis on NSW as a pro­curer and con­sumer of ICT, rather than as a pro­du­cer. So while pro­jects like the OLPC can pro­mote local edu­ca­tion and industry, the NSW gov­ern­ment wants to keep us depend­ent upon for­eign providers.

3 Responses

  1. Bader Says:

    This idea of edu­ca­tion through an inter­act­ive text­book based on a com­puter rap­peals me «The Dia­mond Age, or A Young Lady’s Illus­trated Primer» that tells the story of a com­puter teach­ing book that adapts itself to its user envir­on­ment.
    I think this story can help to under­stand what is the OLPC about.

  2. Jeff Waugh Says:

    Sridar,

    Neither side “delib­er­ately confuse[d] open stand­ards and open source when ques­tioned about them”: The prob­lem lay 100% with the ques­tion. It was very badly over­loaded, and badly mes­saged. It’s not because they’re idi­ots or mali­cious that we need to split those messages.

    The last part of the ques­tion was, “Does either party have a policy for migrat­ing to 100% open stand­ards?” — *any* ques­tion like that should ring alarm bells, and in this case, because it was over­loaded with open source earlier in the query (and agit­ated by the ter­rible mes­saging from the Greens can­did­ate), the MPs were under a cloud. Della Bosca cer­tainly knows the dif­fer­ence, regardless.

    Plus, *both* MPs pro­moted NSW as a pro­du­cer in their state­ments, and referred to the unfor­tu­nate his­tory of “great con­sumer” policy. You’re inac­cur­ately report­ing their statements.

  3. Sridhar Dhanapalan Says:

    Jeff,

    You are cor­rect when you state that the ques­tion wasn’t par­tic­u­larly well-​​phrased, although I did feel that there was at least some degree of delib­er­a­tion in their responses. This is polit­ics, after all. I never implied that they were idi­ots. Maybe I’ve just become cyn­ical in my exper­i­ences :)

    While they did make men­tions of pulling away from the ‘great con­sumer’ policy, I was not per­suaded by their stated plans to do so. Based on this, I can’t see much change occur­ring on this front dur­ing the next elect­oral term.

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

It’s about education, stupid! / 'Til All Are One by Sridhar Dhanapalan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike Australia CC BY-SA AU licence.